39c51c8953
Merge pull request 'Split @Event Parameters Into @Polymorphic and @Property, Remove Marker Interfaces' (#5) from f/new-annotations into develop
Actually, yes I think so. Integer.compare calls Integer.valueOf two times, generating two objects in the process just to execute a statement similar to the one I wrote.
But, to your credit, I…
Because I got rid of the IEvent interface so that every object can be used as an event.
It would, but Objects.requireNonNull makes it immediately obvious to the caller that the parameter has to be non-null. I agree that it doesn't make much of the difference, but as it's handled like…
But isn't that what we want to achieve? A dedicated event listener would not necessarily be referenced from other classes apart from EventBus. Also, EventBus allows the deletion of event…
I coould, but this would mix the actual logic of the method with the logging and bloat up the line.
603fe80df6
Merge pull request 'Restructure Project, Add Annotation Processor' (#4) from f/annotation-processor into develop