JavaFX Integration #4
27
javafx/.classpath
Normal file
27
javafx/.classpath
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<classpath>
|
||||
<classpathentry kind="src" output="target/classes" path="src/main/java">
|
||||
<attributes>
|
||||
<attribute name="optional" value="true"/>
|
||||
<attribute name="maven.pomderived" value="true"/>
|
||||
</attributes>
|
||||
</classpathentry>
|
||||
<classpathentry kind="src" output="target/test-classes" path="src/test/java">
|
||||
<attributes>
|
||||
<attribute name="optional" value="true"/>
|
||||
<attribute name="maven.pomderived" value="true"/>
|
||||
<attribute name="test" value="true"/>
|
||||
</attributes>
|
||||
</classpathentry>
|
||||
<classpathentry kind="con" path="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER/org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.launcher.StandardVMType/JavaSE-11">
|
||||
<attributes>
|
||||
<attribute name="maven.pomderived" value="true"/>
|
||||
</attributes>
|
||||
</classpathentry>
|
||||
<classpathentry kind="con" path="org.eclipse.m2e.MAVEN2_CLASSPATH_CONTAINER">
|
||||
<attributes>
|
||||
<attribute name="maven.pomderived" value="true"/>
|
||||
</attributes>
|
||||
</classpathentry>
|
||||
<classpathentry kind="output" path="target/classes"/>
|
||||
</classpath>
|
||||
23
javafx/.project
Normal file
23
javafx/.project
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<projectDescription>
|
||||
<name>undo-redo-javafx</name>
|
||||
<comment></comment>
|
||||
<projects>
|
||||
</projects>
|
||||
<buildSpec>
|
||||
<buildCommand>
|
||||
<name>org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder</name>
|
||||
<arguments>
|
||||
</arguments>
|
||||
</buildCommand>
|
||||
<buildCommand>
|
||||
<name>org.eclipse.m2e.core.maven2Builder</name>
|
||||
<arguments>
|
||||
</arguments>
|
||||
</buildCommand>
|
||||
</buildSpec>
|
||||
<natures>
|
||||
<nature>org.eclipse.jdt.core.javanature</nature>
|
||||
<nature>org.eclipse.m2e.core.maven2Nature</nature>
|
||||
</natures>
|
||||
</projectDescription>
|
||||
28
javafx/pom.xml
Normal file
28
javafx/pom.xml
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 https://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
|
||||
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
|
||||
|
||||
<artifactId>javafx</artifactId>
|
||||
<name>Undo-Redo JavaFX Integration</name>
|
||||
|
||||
<parent>
|
||||
<groupId>dev.kske</groupId>
|
||||
<artifactId>undo-redo</artifactId>
|
||||
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
|
||||
</parent>
|
||||
|
||||
<dependencies>
|
||||
<dependency>
|
||||
<groupId>dev.kske</groupId>
|
||||
<artifactId>undo-redo-core</artifactId>
|
||||
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
|
||||
</dependency>
|
||||
<dependency>
|
||||
<groupId>org.openjfx</groupId>
|
||||
<artifactId>javafx-base</artifactId>
|
||||
<version>11</version>
|
||||
|
|
||||
</dependency>
|
||||
</dependencies>
|
||||
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Contains JavaFX-based wrapper API for integrating Undo-Redo with JavaFX.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author Kai S. K. Engelbart
|
||||
* @since 0.0.1
|
||||
*/
|
||||
package dev.kske.undoredo.javafx;
|
||||
13
javafx/src/main/java/module-info.java
Normal file
13
javafx/src/main/java/module-info.java
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Contains JavaFX-based wrapper API for integrating Undo-Redo with JavaFX.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author Kai S. K. Engelbart
|
||||
* @since 0.0.1
|
||||
*/
|
||||
module dev.kske.undoredo.javafx {
|
||||
|
||||
exports dev.kske.undoredo.javafx;
|
||||
|
||||
requires dev.kske.undoredo.core;
|
||||
|
kske marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
delvh
commented
`requires transitive`?
kske
commented
The core module doesn't have any dependencies, so this shouldn't make a difference. The core module doesn't have any dependencies, so this shouldn't make a difference.
delvh
commented
I think I think `transitive` is meant for the other way around:
Not that we require all dependencies from that module,
but that modules requiring our module also automatically require the `core` module.
|
||||
requires javafx.base;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Shouldn't it be
provided?Otherwise we run into version problems...
A project using this library should be able to use any JavaFX version >= 11. A fixed version would be defined like this:
[11].<scope>provided</scope>assumes that the dependency is present in some kind of runtime container, like the JDK or a Java EE container, which isn't the case here.I thought that was exactly the goal behind
provided: To declare that any version of JavaFX is possible, as long as it is present...I don't think the scope has anything to do with the version: https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope
There is a possibility to specify version ranger, but the default should be sufficient for us: https://docs.oracle.com/middleware/1212/core/MAVEN/maven_version.htm#MAVEN402